{"id":4980,"date":"2011-08-23T18:43:52","date_gmt":"2011-08-23T23:43:52","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.starshipnivan.com\/blog\/?p=4980"},"modified":"2014-07-10T11:30:45","modified_gmt":"2014-07-10T15:30:45","slug":"are-we-not-as-good-as-men","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/starshipnivan.com\/blog\/?p=4980","title":{"rendered":"&#8220;Are We Not (as Good as) Men?&#8221;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>&#8212; paraphrasing The Sayer of the Law from H. G. Wells&#8217; <em>The Island of Dr. Moreau<\/em><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.starshipnivan.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/08\/Caesar-sm.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-4983\" title=\"Caesar sm\" src=\"http:\/\/www.starshipnivan.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/08\/Caesar-sm.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"432\" height=\"262\" srcset=\"https:\/\/starshipnivan.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/08\/Caesar-sm.jpg 600w, https:\/\/starshipnivan.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/08\/Caesar-sm-300x182.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 432px) 100vw, 432px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>When franchises get stale, Hollywood does reboots &#8212; invariably a prequel that tells an origin story retrofitted to segue into already-made sequels either straight up <em>(Batman, X-Men)<\/em> or in multi-universe alternatives <em>(Star Trek)<\/em>. Given the iconic status of the <em>Planet of the Apes<\/em> original, a similar effort was a matter of time and CGI.<\/p>\n<p>In <em>The Rise of the Planet of the Apes<\/em>, we get the origin story with nods to the original: throwaway references to the loss of crewed starship <em>Icarus<\/em> on its way to Mars; a glimpse of Charlton Heston; the future ape liberator playing with a Lego Statue of Liberty. As Hollywood &#8220;science&#8221; goes, it&#8217;s almost thoughtful, even borderline believable. The idea that the virus that uplifts apes is lethal to humans is of course way too pat, but it lends plausibility to the eventual ape dominion without resorting to the idiotic Ewok-slings-overcome-Stormtrooper-missiles mode. On the other hand, the instant rise to human-level feats of sophistication is ridiculous (more of which anon), to say nothing of being able to sail through thick glass panes unscathed.<\/p>\n<p>The director pulled all the stops to make us root for the cousins we oppress: the humans are so bland they blend with the background, the bad guys mistreat the apes with callous glee\u2026 and the hero, the cognitively enhanced chimpanzee Caesar (brought to disquieting verisimilitude of life by Andy Serkis), not only fights solely in defense of his chosen family\u2026 but to underline his messianic purity he has neither sex drive nor genitals. This kink underlines the high tolerance of US culture for violence compared to its instant vapors over any kind of sex; however, since Project Nim partly foundered on this particular shoal, perhaps it was a wise decision.<\/p>\n<p>As it transpires, Ceasar is exposed to little temptation to distract him from his pilgrimage: there are no female hominids in the film, except for the maternal vessel who undergoes the obligatory death as soon as she produces the hero and a cardboard cutout helpmate there to mouth the variants of &#8220;There are some things we weren&#8217;t meant to do&#8221; &#8212; and as assurance that the human protagonist is not gay, despite his nurturing proclivities. Mind you, the lack of a mother and her female alliances would make Caesar (augmented cortex notwithstanding) a permanent outcast among his fellows, who determine status matrilinearly given the lack of defined paternity.<\/p>\n<p>Loyal to human tropes, Caesar goes from Charly to Che through the stations-of-the-cross character development arc so beloved of Campbel\/lites. Nevertheless, we care what happens to him because Serkis made him compelling and literally soulful. Plus, of course, Caesar&#8217;s cause is patently just. The film is half Spartacus turning his unruly gladiators into a disciplined army, half Moses taking his people home &#8212; decorated with the usual swirls of hubris, unintended consequences, justice, equality, compassion, identity and empathy for the Other.<\/p>\n<p>Needless to say, this reboot revived the topic of animal uplift, a perennial favorite of SF (and transhumanist \u201cscience\u201d which is really a branch of SF, if not fantasy). Human interactions with animals have been integral to all cultures. Myths are strewn with talking animal allies, from Puss in Boots to <em>A Boy and His Dog<\/em>. Beyond their obvious practical and symbolic uses, mammals in particular are the nexus of both our notions of exceptionalism and our ardent wish for companionship. Our fraught relationship with animals also mirrors preoccupations of respective eras. In Wells\u2019 Victorian England, <em>The Island of Dr. Moreau<\/em> struggled with vivisection whereas Linebarger\u2019s Instrumentality Underpeople and the original <em>Planet of the Apes<\/em> focused on racism (plus, in the latter, the specter of nuclear annihilation). Today&#8217;s discussions of animal uplift are really a discussion over whether our terrible stewardship can turn benign &#8212; or at least neutral &#8212; before our inexorable spread damages the planet\u2019s biosphere past recovery.<\/p>\n<p>When SF posits sentient mammal-like aliens, it usually opts for predators high in human totem poles (Anderson&#8217;s eagle-like Ythrians, Cherryh&#8217;s leonine Hani). On the other hand, SF&#8217;s foremost uplift candidates are elephants, cetaceans \u2013 and, of course, bonobos and chimpanzees. All four species share attributes that make them theoretically plausible future companions: social living, so they need to use complex communication; relative longevity, so they can transmit knowledge down the generations; tool use; and unmistakable signs of self-awareness.<\/p>\n<p>Uplift essentially means giving animals human capabilities \u2013 primary among them high executive functions and language. One common misconception seems to be that if we give language to near-cousins, they will end up becoming hairy humans. Along those lines, in <em>Rise<\/em> chimpanzees, gorillas and orangutans are instantly compatible linguistically, emotionally, mentally and socially. In fact, chimpanzees are far closer to us than they are to the other two ape species (with orangutans being the most distant). So although this pan-panism serves the plot and prefigures the species-specific occupations shown in the <em>Ape<\/em> pre\/sequels, real-life chances of such coordination, even with augmentation, are frankly nil.<\/p>\n<p>There is, however, a larger obstacle. Even if a &#8220;smart bomb&#8221; could give instant language processing capability, it would still not confer the ability to enunciate clearly, which is determined by the configuration of the various mouth\/jaw\/throat parts. Ditto for bipedal locomotion. Uplift caused by intervention at whatever level (gene therapy, brain wiring, grafts) cannot bring about coordinated changes across the organism unless we enter the fantasy domain of shapeshifting. This means that a Lamarckian shift in brain wiring will almost certainly result in a seriously suboptimal configuration unlikely to thrive individually or collectively. This could be addressed by singlet custom generation, as is shown for reynards in Crowley&#8217;s <em>Beasts<\/em>, but it would make such specimens hothouse flowers unlikely to propagate unaided, much less become dominant.<\/p>\n<p>In this connection, choosing to give Caesar speech was an erosion of his uniqueness. Of course, if bereft of our kind of speech he would not be able to give gruff Hestonian commands to his army: they would be reliant on line of sight and semaphoring equivalents. However, sticking to complex signed language (which bonobos at least appear capable of, if they acquire it within the same developmental time window as human infants) would keep Caesar and his people uncanny and alien, underlining the irreducible fact of their non-human sentience.<\/p>\n<p>Which brings us to the second fundamental issue of uplift. Even if we succeed in giving animals speech and higher executive functions, they will not be like us. They won&#8217;t think, feel, react as we do. They will be true aliens. There is nothing wrong with that, and such congress might give us a preview of aliens beyond earth, should SETI ever receive a signal. However, given how humans treat even other humans (and possibly how Cro-Magnons treated Neanderthals), it is unlikely we&#8217;ll let uplifted animals go very far past pet, slave or trophy status. In this, at least, Caesar&#8217;s orangutan councillor is right: &#8220;Human no like smart ape,&#8221; no matter how piously we discuss the ethics of animal treatment and our responsibilities as technology wielders.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.starshipnivan.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/08\/Neanderthal-Kennis.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-4984\" title=\"Neanderthal Kennis\" src=\"http:\/\/www.starshipnivan.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/08\/Neanderthal-Kennis.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"431\" height=\"304\" srcset=\"https:\/\/starshipnivan.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/08\/Neanderthal-Kennis.jpg 615w, https:\/\/starshipnivan.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/08\/Neanderthal-Kennis-300x211.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 431px) 100vw, 431px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p><strong>Images:<\/strong> top, Caesar; bottom, Neanderthal reconstruction (Kennis &amp; Kennis, National Geographic). What gazes out of those eyes is &#8212; was &#8212; human.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&#8212; paraphrasing The Sayer of the Law from H. G. Wells&#8217; The Island of Dr. Moreau When franchises get stale, Hollywood does reboots &#8212; invariably a prequel that tells an origin story retrofitted to segue into already-made sequels either straight up (Batman, X-Men) or in multi-universe alternatives (Star Trek). Given the iconic status of the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6,10,13],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4980","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-biology-and-culture","category-science","category-science-fiction"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/starshipnivan.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4980","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/starshipnivan.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/starshipnivan.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starshipnivan.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starshipnivan.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=4980"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/starshipnivan.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4980\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/starshipnivan.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=4980"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starshipnivan.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=4980"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/starshipnivan.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=4980"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}